Design-partner discussions

Define the pilot before evaluating the product.

Use a bounded, shadow-mode evaluation to test whether the review process is useful. The scope below is a discussion framework, not a signed service commitment.

Proposed scope

Keep responsibilities and outcomes explicit.

Start with synthetic cases

Check functionality, workflow, and records without processing actual candidate information.

Agree before expanding

Approve data handling, job criteria, reviewers, sample selection, timing, and commercial terms before using any real data.

No automatic candidate action

Operate separately from the live hiring outcome. Record disagreement and reviewer findings without updating an ATS automatically.

Deliverables to confirm in the pilot agreement

  • A documented workflow, criteria, and responsibility map.
  • A reviewable record for each included case, including missing responses.
  • An evaluation report separating useful findings, false alarms, review effort, and execution cost.
  • A joint go/no-go discussion based on agreed thresholds.

Customer responsibilities include authorised data access, a named HR owner, qualified reviewers, and participation from security or procurement as required. Evolyxis responsibilities and support arrangements are agreed in writing.

Planning tool

Estimate review effort from your own assumptions.

The initial inputs are editable examples. They are not Evolyxis measurements, prices, or recommended staffing levels.

The estimate excludes model charges, implementation, and platform fees. No financial return or time saving is promised.

Pilot scoping

Define the evaluation before discussing deployment.

Use this worksheet to prepare a pilot discussion. The starting numbers are editable planning assumptions, not measured performance, a price, or a delivery commitment.

Proposed scope only: synthetic evidence, a documented baseline, saved model outcomes, and human review. Scope, fees, dates, deliverables, and processing terms require a separate agreement.

Enter 1–200 whole cases and 1–240 minutes per step. These are worksheet limits, not offered pilot terms. Do not enter candidate information.

Estimated evaluation effort from your assumptions

Baseline work: 3.3 hours. Assisted-review work: 5.0 hours. Combined human effort for both evaluation stages: 8.3 hours.

This adds the two stages because both are performed for the evaluation. It does not estimate savings. Setup, adjudication, provider latency, and other work are excluded.

Discuss this evaluation

The worksheet is prepared in this page and downloaded on request. Opening the inquiry form is a separate action; worksheet inputs are not automatically submitted.